This site may earn affiliate commissions from the links on this folio. Terms of use.

dna storage head

In flash memory, as with everything else in tech these days, making things smaller than almost 20 nanometers is very, very difficult. Building transistors at fourteen nm, so 10nm, allows engineers to pack more and more information into the same concrete space — a process that has taken u.s. from 64-megabyte solid state drives to 32-gigabyte keychains. Yet there is i data storage medium that works in units many times smaller than even the most advanced computers, i that's been in use in one grade or another for quite some time indeed: Dna. A team of scientists presenting at the 250th National Coming together & Exposition of the American Chemical Club say they can use genetic cloth to safely store information — for 2000 years, or more.

Deoxyribonucleic acid is the data storage molecule of biology. In the case of the human genome, it packs about 750 megabytes of raw information into a jail cell nucleus just a few micrometers across — fifty-fifty the best digital storage media crave a few foursquare centimeters to achieve the same thing. A DNA nucleic acid (an A, C, T, or G) is simply a fewangstrom across, and naturally forms a helix just a couple of nanometers in diameter. And since it works with 4 possible bit states, it uses a much more than efficient quaternary coding system, rather than binary ones and zeroes. In other words, DNA has the capacity to pack a lot of information into a very minor physical infinite.

A micrograph of silica nano-beads, from an unrelated study.

A micrograph of silica nano-chaplet, from an unrelated study.

Of form, DNA also makes a lot of copying errors — cancer rates can speak to that, all on their own. It's important, when storing information, to store itaccurately, so scientists must figure out a fashion to shore up many of Dna'south inherent fidelity issues. Other teams have used Deoxyribonucleic acid for information storage, but this team focused on keeping that information intact for every bit long every bit possible. They put their information-loaded DNA fragments within silica spheres, giving them a mensurate of protection, then heated the samples for a week at 160°F (70°C). They fence that this is equivalent to about 2,000 years of storage at 50°F, or 10°C.

As an aside, here'due south a fun fiddling exercise that illustrates the size of a drop of water: how many molecules of water are there in a drop? Well, there are most 20 drops in a mL, and a mL of water weighs a gram, and a gram of water is i/18th of a mole, and a mole of h2o has 6.022*1023 molecules… so at that place's (6E23/(18*20)) = one.7*ten21, or 1,700,000,000,000,000,000,000 molecules. The point is that, seen from the diminutive perspective, a droplet of water is really big.

At present, imagine how much information could exist packed into that same drop of water, with a storage medium as efficient as Deoxyribonucleic acid. At that point, the bulwark becomes non how much information you can physically fit, merely how safe and reliable you want information technology to be. I of the best means to make sure you accurately preserve Deoxyribonucleic acid information is to store multiple copies together, and so yous tin can later compare multiple versions of the final "file" to determine which, if any, has acquired damage during storage. Combined with the physical size of the protective silica spheres, this does reduce the full possible data that tin be stored per volume of liquid.

Another large downside to Deoxyribonucleic acid storage is how irksome and clunky the data retrieval process is; even with modern, loftier-throughput sequencing engineering, reading a molecule of Deoxyribonucleic acid takes orders of magnitude longer than reading a estimator file; y'all wouldn't desire to store anything you demand speedily or frequently, with Dna.

Samsung Flash SSDSo whatwould you want to store with Dna? Anything that needs to exist stored, with accuracy, for long periods of time. Time sheathing data, perhaps a snapshot of Wikipedia loaded into a vial and buried for time to come generations, could exist well suited, and since homo beings are unlikely to brand their own genomes obsolete any time presently, we can be sure future people retrieving this information volition have some sort of DNA-reading technology in identify. You tin can't assume that sort of continued like shooting fish in a barrel technological accessibility, on the scale of millennia, for anything else except mayhap physical writing.

Another possible aspect of DNA storage is data security. If you accept information you want to keep safe, and that you lot're sure you yourself won't all of a sudden need chop-chop (say, scientific information about how to engineer a particularly deadly virus), then pioneering a uniquely difficult-to-sequence course of Deoxyribonucleic acid that requires special techniques could safely effectively preserve that noesis. Even if terrorists or some other boogeyman did manage to go their hands on the concrete sample, sequencing it to read the contents would crave biochemists, and lots of experimental trial and mistake. Cryptographic attacks wouldn't help in the slightest — though yous'd still need them if the information had been encrypted before it was stored in the Dna.

In the finish, this isn't a breakthrough that will revolutionize anyone's day-to-twenty-four hour period existence, but information technology is an intriguing step forrard, and one that excites the imagination.